UPDATE

It’s been a while since we posted, so here’s a quick run down on where we’re at in our quest to bring back fairness to sports and race wagering in Australia.

Northern Territory

Consistent with recent posts, we are still getting no help whatsoever from the Northern Territory Racing Commission (NTRC) or the Northern Territory Government.

This is the regulatory authority that in mid-2013 removed the rule requiring bookmakers to bet all punters to win a minimum amount ($1000) on racing.

We put the following to the Northern Territory Minister for Business, David Tollner:

  • “Are you planing to make any changes to the way the NTRC operates and how it oversees the regulation of bookmakers in the NT? We are particularly referring to one of the objects of the NT Racing and Betting act: “(c) to promote fairness, integrity and efficiency in the operations of persons engaged in racing and betting in the Territory”.”

He responded:

  • “I do not wish to interfere with their (NTRC’s) independence” He then goes on to note a VCAT case where it was found that “a bookmaker cannot be compelled to accept a wager from a person” before he concluded that: “In essence, each wager is a contract and no person can be compelled to contract with another. This fully supports the Racing Commission’s stance.”

Bookmakers licensed by the Northern Territory Government are turning over close to $6 billion annually with conservative profit estimates of $400 million. Last financial year they paid just $2.4 million in tax to the NT Government through a levy on gross wagering profits, capped at $250,000 per bookmaker.

So why are the NT Government so keen to bow down to these highly profitable foreign-owned bookmaking firms given that tax receipts are so low? We have been led to believe it has a lot to do with Federal GST rebates. Huge rebates on the GST bookmakers pay. If anyone can contribute on this issue, let us know.

Code of Conduct 

Rich has met with and continues to meet with several significant stakeholders including bookmakers, direct racing participants and administrators, in an effort to have our proposed Code of Conduct accepted.

At least ONE bookmaker has indicated that they are willing to sign off on the Code of Conduct straight away.

Other conversations are ongoing and we will await further responses in the next few weeks.

Integrity

Integrity continues to be a huge issue facing sports and racing bodies. Banning winning punters here drives a considerable amount of money offshore to a multitude of bookmakers including Pinnacle and SBOBet, where information sharing agreements with Australian sports and racing bodies are non-existent.

Money becomes untraceable and massive concerns have to be raised about possible match-fixing and corruption. All on the NT Government watch.

We will be pushing for Federal action in the upcoming months as it has become clear that State and Territory regulators are completely complicit with bookmakers.

Twitter

In a short time, we have passed the 700 follower mark @FairWagering. Twitter conversation has been open and honest. We thank all for contributing to the discussion and hope that we can continue to use social media to draw attention to the issues and to conduct a balanced debate about bringing back fairness and integrity to Australian wagering.

Dave

One thought on “UPDATE

  1. Senator Xenophon said on Today Tonight 31/10/2013 that he would introduce Federal legislation to overrule the NT’s licensing of the corporates.

    Senator X is right up to speed on the banning/restricting issues. He will continue to agitate but that is not enough to achieve anything.

    He is flat out and barely has time to get briefed for his urgent stuff or to read anything in depth for himself. And unfortunately for punters the NT situation is not on his urgent list. None-the-less I believe he is genuine in wanting to rectify the situation.

    According to a lawyer familiar with the situation, what is needed is someone to:

    Determine what the objective is. Legislative reform? Which Statute? Which Section? What might the wording be? (I think it will be constitutionally valid under the federal power to regulate corporations). Identify who is supportive. Whose Ministry is it? Bring together all of the good arguments in one portfolio. Précis the arguments. Do some specific examples of the affects on “On course” and some individual personal stories. Get some examples that can be held up. Write an executive summary.

    If that were done, I can guarantee it would be brought to Senator X’s attention, and I believe he would then take it further.

    Maybe there is a lawyer who is affected who will do it, maybe a number of punters would be ready to chip in to pay a lawyer to do the ground work. I’d stump up $500 – I could do the job, but likely less capably than a competent lawyer and anyway I’m flat out trying to make a living with 38c bets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s